Skip to content

Administration

2020-04-27 11:55:25


  • @ ministers were appointed by the King and it was not hereditary.

    B D Chattopadhyay suggested that it is unlikely that they the Satvahanas would have been centralised state. The Maharathi and Mahabhojas would have had been local rulers.

  • Coins suggested that these local rulers swayed in their loyalty. They also had matrimonial ties with the Satavahanas.

  • The empire was divided into Aharas.

  • Amatyas, Mahamatra, mahasenapati etc were official

![[9.2 Satvahanas#Polity and Coinage]]

![[Pasted image 20220921182159.png]]