The Partition of Bengal 1905
The Partition of Bengal 1905
Section titled “The Partition of Bengal 1905”2020-04-27 15:16:20
Partition Plan
Section titled “Partition Plan”- Masterpiece of Internal policy to estd 2 provinces of Bengal proper and Eastern Bengal and Assam.
- He described it as mere readjustment of adm reforms.
- A/C to him Mymensingh and Backergange division were lawless and crime was prevalent.
- New Province of Eastern Bengal and Assam had HQ at Dacca with Muslims at majority to be under a Lt Governor.
- Western Bengal included Bihar and Orissa had 42mil Hindus and 9mil Mohammedans.
Anti Partition Campaign 1903-1905 Was
Section titled “Anti Partition Campaign 1903-1905 Was”- Administration of Bengal had become a unwieldy due to increase in population. But the real motive was political.
- Curzon’s aim was to make Bengali’s a linguistic minority and prop up Muslims against Hindus since Bengali Nationalims and solidarity was growing.
- Curzon said that his aim was to create a Mohammedan province where Islam could be predominant and in ascendancy.
- led by Surendranath Banerjea, K.K. Mitra and Prithwishchandra Ray
- through pamphlets and newspapers like Hitabadi, Sanjibani and Bengalee.
- Mulsims who participated in Anti-Partion movement of 1902-03 were ==Barrister Abdul Rasul, Liaqat Hussain, Maulana Azad. Upper and middle class Muslims stayed away==.
- Subramnian Siva and Chidambram Pillai led strikes in Tuticorin and Tiunelveli in 1903-05.
- The partition of Begal was annulled in 1911 mainly done to curb revolutionary terrorism.
- Was decided to shift capital to Delhi -> end of Bengali dominance in national politics. Bihar and Orissa were taken out of Bengal and Assam was made a separate province.
The Partition of Bengal (1905); The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal; the economic and political aspects of Swadeshi Movement;
-
Write a critical note on: Significance of the Swadeshi Movement 1905-07 in the freedom struggle. [1981, 20m]
-
“Curzon’s political obtusely created a breach between government and people which was never wholly closed in the remaining forty-two years of British rule.” Comment. [1984, 20m]
-
“Curzon was an unconscious catalyst who did not understand, let alone desire, what the new century was about to bring forth, but who helped it to be born.” Comment. [1989, 20m]
-
“The tragedy of Cruzan lay in that, with such abundance of trained talent; he was denied the crowning qualities. He was never an administrator of the first rank.” Comment. [1991, 20m]
-
“Curzon’s partition of Bengal gave the unwitting initiative to events of magnitude and returned many years later to port with the cargo of freedom.” Comment. [1997, 20m]
-
“India after 1905 had new interests and objectives and compelled new lines of policy.” Comment. [1996, 20m]
-
“The Anti-Partition Agitation (1905) had an economic character in Bengal unlike the Extremist Agitation in Maharashtra which had a religious character.” Examine. [2014, 20m]
-
Explain “Constructive Swadeshi” Characterised by atmashakti (self-reliance), which propelled the Swadeshi Movement in Bengal. [2016, 10m]