Skip to content

Factors for Decline of the Mughal Empire [^2]

2020-04-26 19:32 :30


  • William Irvine and Jadunath Sarkar : decline of character of Emperors, nobles
  • Sarkar called A religious fanatic and successors as mere shadow’s of predecessors
  • It had both adm and social basis. Its success depended on the ability of the holder to exact sufficient resources from it and maintianing a sufficient quota for service.
  • Nobles should have had a vested interest in collecting revenue, his ability to work with the faujdar and compel zamindars and sometimes owner cultivators on a caste basis to pay.
  • Many zamindars were converted into paying kharaj (land revenue) collecting agents who had a fixed share in the exaction called a Nankar.
  • Due to the rapid expansion of no of mansabdars their salaries also increased -> mismatch b/w available resources and demands of salaries. Which was met by reducing salaries and no of troops and horses mansabdar that was required to maintain.
  • A trial to expand this to Deccan where the situation was entirely different was the real crisi of the Jagirdari system.

Irfan Habib’s ‘Agrarian System of Mughal India

  • Revenue system inherently flawed, kept at the highest possible rate for maintaining greatest military strength
  • Jagirdars frequently transferred - lack of farsightedness, loyalty to an area
  • No surplus left with peasantry to advance agri tech
  • dissent, revolts, migration

M Alam : conflict b/w communities could not mobilise beyond narrow bounds, flawed political integration,

  • zamindars madad I mash owners jagirdars colluded to resist transfers encroachment,
  • Awadh Punjab had economic growth led to rise of these classes - emergence of indep regional units
  • Chetan Singh - #todo
  • Religious policies alienated Hindus
  • Mil campaign against Bijapur, Golconda, Marathas
  • Mughal admn
  • Recurrent wars of succession - weakened mil,
  • JN Sarkar - crisis was of weak emperors countered by Percival spear
  • No later conquests shrank resources, created crisis b/w emperor and aristocracy
  • Incorporation of nobles from deccan, golconda, bijapur created rift - Jagirdari crisis 445 nobles controlled 61% jagirs
  • Price rise, personal insecurity
  • Recurring peasant revolt for political assertion and communitarian identities
  • Zamindars turned against the state, loyalty shifted, defied authority
  • Local power groups emerged

Factors for the decline of the Mughal Empire

  1. In which respects did the policies of Aurangzeb contribute to the disintegration of the Mughal Empire? [1979, 60m]
  1. Explain with illustrative detail the part played by the following factors in the disintegration of the Mughal Empire: [1981, 60m] (a) Aurangzeb’s alleged departure from the policies of his predecessors, [1981, 20m] (b) Inherent defects of the Mansab and Jagir system. [1981, 20m] (c) Growth of new political forces in the provinces. [1981, 20m]
  1. “The expansion of Mughal Empire in Deccan brought about its decline.” Discuss. [1988, 60m]
  1. Do you think that the agrarian crisis of the 17th century led to the disintegration of the Mughal empire? Discuss. [2016, 20 Marks]
  1. “The Afghan invasions in the Eighteenth Century not only signified the military irrelevance of the Mughal Empire but also hastened its decline”. Explain. [2018, 15 Marks]
  1. How would you like to characterize the eighteenth century in Indian history? [2005, 60m]
  1. What are the distinguishing components of the debate on “The Eighteenth Century”? [2008, 60m]
  1. < https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/20287/1/Unit-35.pdf> #important

  2. Sekhar Bandyopadhyay