Skip to content

Industrialisation in other Countries - USA, GER, Russia, Japan

Industrialisation in other Countries - USA, GER, Russia, Japan

Section titled “Industrialisation in other Countries - USA, GER, Russia, Japan”

2020-04-27 15:34 :59


  • availability of labour due to heavy mortality in wars,
  • territories of GER states not provide manufacturers with well integrated market,
  • Holy Roman Empire German Bund after 1815 did not do enough
  • Quality of coal iron, no dev of coking, puddling process
  • Labour mobility affected due to serfdom
  • Capital supply limited
  • Paternalism in German state restricted residence rights of those from outside
  • Serf emancipation in 1800s
  • Creation of Zollverein 1830s
  • Dismantling of paternalist conventions 1848-49
  • 7 yrs war depressed production, productivity after 1756 major inc in agri became noticeable
  • Fredrick II gave cultivators extensive rights
  • Small scale industry based on guild became a common feature Berlin, Rhineland, Silesia, Saxony
  • Silesia state appointed directors to boards of companies

Legislation in Revolutionary + Napoleonic Period

Section titled “Legislation in Revolutionary + Napoleonic Period”
  • Rhineland dismantled of guilds, privileges abolished, continental sys inc demand, woollen factories inc, exported to RUS SPA
  • Emulation of Revo practice like emancipation of serfdom its impacts were limited but decisive and ubiquitous
  • Later fixing serf rights of property, Rentenbanken provided landowners with redemption payments and long tenures
  • 1820s gradual dev of large regional market, removed many hurdles facing distribution of mfd goods in GER states
  • Low duties on raw material, heavy on colonial goods
  • South German league of Bavaria, Central League of Saxony, Hannover
  • 1834 more states of Hanover, Holstein, Mecklenburg, Oldenburg joined
  • Major stimulus, extension of home market around the internal river sys
  • Began 1830s, private lines dominated, state construction in Bavaria, Baden
  • Iron ore output inc
  • On the model of Credit Mobilier, Societe Generale
  • Banking house set up by von Haben, Rothschild, Dresdner Bank, Deutsche Bank, Darmstadter Bank
  • Payment of indemnity from France after 1870
  • Crisis in 1873
  • Demand for railway equipment in US,
  • Thomas Gilchrist patenting steelmaking extensive use of phosphoric iron ore resources
  • Great Joint stock banks were encouraging force - intervened directly in policy formulation
  • #todo
  • Guided by communism, factory based production - big in size
  • Mass production, no role of market forces - production determined by state
  • All factories owned by state, pace was rapid after 1921
  • Exploitation of working class absent, capital goods focused
  • Triggered by spirit of Nationalism
  • Till 1853-54 followed closed door policy fear of colonisation
  • 1853 US naval commander Mathew Perry forced JP to abandon CD policy
  • Humiliation 1868 Meiji Revo took place restore JP pride
  • Capitalism based, Factory base production, Mass production, Based on Laissez Faire, State provided capital
  • Reverse engg , aim at cheaper goods, meet domestic need first
  • Pace was rapid, JP achieved 30 yrs, exploitation of working class was less, Electrical good focused

[[Unit-10.pdf]] - Industrial Capitalism in France and Germany [[Unit-11.pdf]] - Industrial Capitalims in Russia [[Unit-9 1.pdf]] - Meiji Restoration [[Unit-11 1.pdf]] - Cultural Development in Japan [[Unit-12 1.pdf]] - Economic Development in Japan



  1. The Industrial Revolution brought about great changes in the social and economic life of Europe. Explain. [1998, 60 Marks]
  1. What was the extent of industrialisation in Western Europe by the end of the nineteenth century? [2009, 30 Marks]
  1. “Whoever says Industrial Revolution, says cotton.” Comment. [2011, 20 Marks]
  1. The process of industrialisation in some other countries of Europe was different from that in England.” [2012, 20 Marks]
  1. Discuss how Japan industrialised after the Meiji Restorations. What were the consequences for its neighbours? [2018, 20 Marks]