Skip to content

The Moderates and Extremists

2020-04-27 15:15:22


  • congress split at Surat in December 1907. Session was presided by Rash Behari Ghosh.
  • Moderates wanted to work within the constitutional framework under the British Empire.
  • Extremists believed that the war of independence had begun.
  • Pherozeshah Mehta, Dinshaw Wacha, Gokhale did not appreciate radical tendencies.
  • Lal, Tilak wanted reconciliation.
  • Ajit Singh not wanted compromise.
  • Issue was how to incorporate radicalism into future politics of Congress.
  • 1906 Calcutta session - victory of Extremists w/ support from C Moderates 4 res passed partition condemned.
    • Boycott, swadeshi, national education, swaraj.
    • Extremist party born w/ Tilak as leader.
  • 1907 - scheduled at Poona which was extremist stronghold but moderates shifted it to Surat, Lala refused president, Rash Behari Ghosh won.
    • FS Mehta wanted purging of extremists.
    • 1908 Bengal model of politics rejected, allegiance to Raj reiterated.
  • Lacked faith in common people and failed to acquire a root among them
  • Failed to organise mass movements
  • idea of pleas did not bring enough administrative and other reforms and were treated with contempt by the British.
  • beliefs and political ideas had become obsolete.
  • seen as the weaker link among the nationalists.
  • John Morley in 1907 put forward the policy of repression-conciliation-suppression aka the policy of carrot and stick.
  • Moderates led by Pherozshah Mehta thought it to be dangerous to be with the extremists.
  • Both the parties were unable to see that the colonial state was negotiating because of the fear of extremists and that the Moderates were the outer defence for the extremists.
  • Both failed to gauge the importance of a nationwide mass movement.
  • First 20 yrs moderate politics, anglicised upper class, little time for full politics, uniformity in objective
  • Influenced by Utilitarian theories, Edmund Burke, JS Mill, John Morley
  • Equated liberty w/ class privilege, gradual piecemeal reform
  • Ltd self gov
  • Abolition of IN Council which prevented liberal policies
  • Broaden IN participation, 50% elected rep in local bodies, chambers of commerce, univs etc
  • New councils NWFP, PUN
  • 2 IN mem in Viceroys Exec council
  • Right to discuss, vote and interpellation.
  • Indianisation of civil services, stop money drain, against racism.
  • Mil expenditure be reduced.
  • Against classical economic theory of free trade, newer mode of extraction through free trade and foreign capital investment.
  • None demands fulfilled.
    • IT reimposed in 1886.
    • Salt tax raised from Rs 2 - 2.5.
    • Fowler comm fixed high exchange rate for Rupee.
  • Not organised agitation.
  • Leader of the moderate factions.
  • mem of ILC in 1903.
  • started Hitavada as English weekly.
  • Secy Deccan Ed Society.
  • visited Ireland.
  • started Jnanaprakash as daily newspaper.
  • Servants of IN society, mentor of Gandhi & Jinnah.
  • Did not appreciate radicalism.
  • demanded self governance on like Canada, Australia.
  • Instrumental in the formation of Morley Minto reform.
  • Reaction to failure of moderates, Lal Bal Pal
  • Goal - Swaraj
  • #todo BL Grover page 304
  • Factionalism : Bengalee vs Amrita Bazaar patrika, Gokhale vs Tilak, division of Arya samaj,
  • Frustration w/ moderate politics.
  • Curzon’s policies : racial arrogance, despotic imperialism, Calcutta Municipal Amendment Act 1899 reduced elec reps, IN Universities act 1904, partition. [[#Gopal Krishna Gokhale 1866-1915]]