The Moderates and Extremists
The Moderates and Extremists
Section titled “The Moderates and Extremists”2020-04-27 15:15:22
Surat Split
Section titled “Surat Split”- congress split at Surat in December 1907. Session was presided by Rash Behari Ghosh.
- Moderates wanted to work within the constitutional framework under the British Empire.
- Extremists believed that the war of independence had begun.
- Pherozeshah Mehta, Dinshaw Wacha, Gokhale did not appreciate radical tendencies.
- Lal, Tilak wanted reconciliation.
- Ajit Singh not wanted compromise.
- Issue was how to incorporate radicalism into future politics of Congress.
- 1906 Calcutta session - victory of Extremists w/ support from C Moderates 4 res passed partition condemned.
- Boycott, swadeshi, national education, swaraj.
- Extremist party born w/ Tilak as leader.
- 1907 - scheduled at Poona which was extremist stronghold but moderates shifted it to Surat, Lala refused president, Rash Behari Ghosh won.
- FS Mehta wanted purging of extremists.
- 1908 Bengal model of politics rejected, allegiance to Raj reiterated.
Failures and Limitations of Moderates
Section titled “Failures and Limitations of Moderates”- Lacked faith in common people and failed to acquire a root among them
- Failed to organise mass movements
- idea of pleas did not bring enough administrative and other reforms and were treated with contempt by the British.
- beliefs and political ideas had become obsolete.
- seen as the weaker link among the nationalists.
- John Morley in 1907 put forward the policy of repression-conciliation-suppression aka the policy of carrot and stick.
- Moderates led by Pherozshah Mehta thought it to be dangerous to be with the extremists.
- Both the parties were unable to see that the colonial state was negotiating because of the fear of extremists and that the Moderates were the outer defence for the extremists.
- Both failed to gauge the importance of a nationwide mass movement.
Analysis of Moderates
Section titled “Analysis of Moderates”- First 20 yrs moderate politics, anglicised upper class, little time for full politics, uniformity in objective
- Influenced by Utilitarian theories, Edmund Burke, JS Mill, John Morley
- Equated liberty w/ class privilege, gradual piecemeal reform
Moderate Demands
Section titled “Moderate Demands”- Ltd self gov
- Abolition of IN Council which prevented liberal policies
- Broaden IN participation, 50% elected rep in local bodies, chambers of commerce, univs etc
- New councils NWFP, PUN
- 2 IN mem in Viceroys Exec council
- Right to discuss, vote and interpellation.
- Indianisation of civil services, stop money drain, against racism.
- Mil expenditure be reduced.
- Against classical economic theory of free trade, newer mode of extraction through free trade and foreign capital investment.
- None demands fulfilled.
- IT reimposed in 1886.
- Salt tax raised from Rs 2 - 2.5.
- Fowler comm fixed high exchange rate for Rupee.
- Not organised agitation.
Gopal Krishna Gokhale (1866-1915)
Section titled “Gopal Krishna Gokhale (1866-1915)”- Leader of the moderate factions.
- mem of ILC in 1903.
- started Hitavada as English weekly.
- Secy Deccan Ed Society.
- visited Ireland.
- started Jnanaprakash as daily newspaper.
- Servants of IN society, mentor of Gandhi & Jinnah.
- Did not appreciate radicalism.
- demanded self governance on like Canada, Australia.
- Instrumental in the formation of Morley Minto reform.
Extremists
Section titled “Extremists”- Reaction to failure of moderates, Lal Bal Pal
- Goal - Swaraj
- #todo BL Grover page 304
Causes
Section titled “Causes”- Factionalism : Bengalee vs Amrita Bazaar patrika, Gokhale vs Tilak, division of Arya samaj,
- Frustration w/ moderate politics.
- Curzon’s policies : racial arrogance, despotic imperialism, Calcutta Municipal Amendment Act 1899 reduced elec reps, IN Universities act 1904, partition. [[#Gopal Krishna Gokhale 1866-1915]]